Legal Opinion
Barron G. Collier, Inc. v. Paddock
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1930No. Civil No. 2885PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.
Barron G. Collier, Incorporated, filed an action against the City of Phoenix and its officers praying that they be restrained from interfering with its advertising rights upon the street-cars owned by the City, and from orders sustaining a gen eral demurrer to its complaint and dismissing the action, the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal'.
It appears from the record that on July 29, 1924, the plaintiff and the Phoenix Railway Company of Arizona, a corporation, then owning and operating the street-car system of Phoenix, entered into a written contract by which the plaintiff was granted for a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Chicago, Vermilion & Wilmington Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1875
- City of Louisville v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- City of Mobile v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Johnson International, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- The Gamewell Company, a Corporation v. The City of Phoenix, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- City of Tucson v. Arizona Alpha of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Town of Holbrook v. GirandArizona Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.