Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Furgess

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2016No. 448 EDA 2016PublishedCited by 280 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SOLANO, J.:

Appellant, Robert Furgess, appeals pro se from,the order dismissing his second petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. The PCRA court found Appellant’s petition to be untimely and therefore not within its jurisdiction. Upon review, we affirm.

■ At' the conclusion of a bench trial on October 27, 1989, Appellant was convicted of first-degree murder and possession of an instrument of crime (PIC). 1 The trial court sentenced Appellant to life imprisonment for the murder conviction, -and a concurrent term of one to two years’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. BarndtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. CintoraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by280 opinions

  1. Com. of Pa. v. MontgomerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. PewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Cobbs, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Cobbs, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

275 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API