Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pew

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 2018No. 2051 EDA 2017PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY STEVENS, P.J.E.:

Appellant Alfonso Percy Pew appeals pro se from the Order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on June 8, 2017, denying as untimely his serial petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act.1 We affirm.

A panel of this Court previously set forth the relevant facts and procedural history on appeal from the Order entered on October 16, 1995, denying Appellant's first PCRA petition as follows:

Appellant participated in a plot with Darrin Wilder and Sean Simpson to rob William Robinson, a drug dealer who was undercutting Wilder's drug…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Com. v. Bankhead, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. Cobbs, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Stahl, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Com. v. Bankhead, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Cobbs, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API