Commonwealth v. Matos
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.
At issue in this case is the meaning of the language in G. L. c. 272, § 4A, inserted by St. 1979, c. 676, which makes it a penalty to “induce[] a minor to become a prostitute.” After a jury trial in the Superior Court, the defendant was convicted under the statute of “inducing] a minor to become a prostitute.” The defendant also was convicted of deriving support from the earnings or proceeds of a prostitute, G. L. c. 272, § 7, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor, G. L. c. 119, § 63.1 The defendant appeals.
The defendant contends that in order to be convicted of inducing a minor to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. Zone Book, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VelezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. HalstromMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. MolinaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. OwensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.