Peterson v. Rasmussen
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Charles 0. Busiclc, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
NICOL, P. J., pro tem.
This is an action for damages for an alleged libel on plaintiff, committed by means of a letter written by appellant Mrs. C. (Boline) Rasmussen in the Danish language. It is not disputed that the said appellant wrote the letter and that it was delivered to and read by the addressees, a certain Mr. and Mrs. Simonsen, in Sacramento.
Briefly, the complaint alleges that plaintiff is an unmarried woman of twenty-four years of age; that the defendants are husband and wife, residing together as such near Loomis, in Placer County; that on the seventh day of March, 1917, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Willard v. Valley Gas & Fuel Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Schomberg v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Clark v. North American Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Adams v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Bohan v. Record Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DiGiorgio Furit Corp. v. American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial OragnizationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Golden North Airways, Inc., a Corporation v. Tanana Publishing Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. AFL-CIOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Hellar v. BiancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Vedovi v. Watson & TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.