Legal Opinion

Vedovi v. Watson & Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1930No. Docket No. 6881PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

Appeal from a judgment given in an action for libel for failure to amend after the demurrer to the amended complaint had been sustained. Since the four causes of action set forth in such complaint are alike in form and substance except only as to the recipient of the respective notices and the amount therein stated as due, it will be sufficient, for the present purposes as suggested by counsel, to consider only the sufficiency of the first cause of action. As to the publication of the alleged libel it alleges “that the• defendant . . . published, declared and circulated of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Schomberg v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Harris v. ZanoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Tonini v. CevascoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Edwards v. San Jose Printing & Publishing SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bates v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Golden North Airways, Inc., a Corporation v. Tanana Publishing Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Keenan v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Carlisle v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API