Vedovi v. Watson & Taylor
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
Appeal from a judgment given in an action for libel for failure to amend after the demurrer to the amended complaint had been sustained. Since the four causes of action set forth in such complaint are alike in form and substance except only as to the recipient of the respective notices and the amount therein stated as due, it will be sufficient, for the present purposes as suggested by counsel, to consider only the sufficiency of the first cause of action. As to the publication of the alleged libel it alleges “that the• defendant . . . published, declared and circulated of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Schomberg v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Harris v. ZanoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Tonini v. CevascoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Edwards v. San Jose Printing & Publishing SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bates v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Golden North Airways, Inc., a Corporation v. Tanana Publishing Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Keenan v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Carlisle v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.