Legal Opinion

Hellar v. Bianco

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1952No. Civ. 8103PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

Appellant brought this action against respondents, seeking to recover damages for a libelous publication. At the trial she made proof as follows: Respondents were the proprietors of a public tavern and for the convenience of patrons maintained a toilet room for men on the wall of which there appeared on May 4, 1950, libelous matter indicating that appellant was an unchaste woman who indulged in illicit amatory ventures. The writer recommended that anyone interested should call a stated telephone number, which was the number of the telephone in appellant’s home, and “ask for Isabelle,” that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hale v. DepaoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Westman v. Clifton's Brookdale, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Dressel v. Parr Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Peterson v. RasmussenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Roberts v. McAfee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Nichols v. Great American Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Live Oak Publishing Co. v. CohaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Haley v. Casa Del Rey Homeowners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API