Dore v. Sellers
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Rhodes, J.
This action is brought under the Mechanics’ Lien Act of 1862. Sellers and Goldstein, being the owners of a certain lot in San Francisco, contracted in writing with Griblin for the construction of two houses for a price named, payable in instalments. Griblin contracted in writing with Zurn and Hannigan to do the carpenter work on the buildings and furnish the materials for the work. On the 12th of January, 1863, the sub-contractors gave notice to the contractor and the architect, that they could not complete their contract, and they then abandoned the work. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bowen v. AubreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kellogg v. HowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Davis v. LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Frost v. FalgetterNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Shaver v. MurdockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Los Angeles Pressed Brick Co. v. Los Angeles Pacific Boulevard & Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.