Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Bennett v. Glynn
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 23, 1966PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
This action was reserved by the Superior Court on a stipulation of facts requesting an answer to one specific question. That question is: “Does Section 9-167a of the General Statutes, as amended, apply to the Board of Tax Review of the City of Hartford?” The statute mentioned is the so-called “Minority Representation” statute, and it is obvious that an answer to the question propounded is sufficiently in the public interest so that this court is justified in entertaining the reservation. Practice Book §§ 738, 739; General Statutes § 52-235; Barr v. First Taxing District, 147 Conn. 221, 223,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Lee Bros. Furniture Co. v. CramSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- State v. BensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Baker v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Park Regional Corporation v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. DupreeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Athanson v. GrassoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Town of WethersfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.