Legal Opinion
Baker v. City of Norwalk
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 7, 1965PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
The plaintiffs are electors, taxpayers, and inhabitants of the defendant city of Norwalk. They seek an injunction permanently restraining the city, its employees and agents from (1) constructing, or planning the construction of, a city hall within the confines of a tract of land in that city, commonly known as the Mathews estate, and claimed by the plaintiffs to be a public park, and (2) committing any public funds for such purposes. They also seek an injunction permanently restraining the defendant John H. Gaydosh, an architect, from making plans, on behalf of the city, for the city hall.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Brown v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Shanley v. JankuraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Borough of Fenwick v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- McGaffin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Klapproth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Celentano v. Oaks Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.