Legal Opinion

Harter Tomato Products Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 23, 1998No. 96-1326PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

After a company which processed tomato paste, tomatoes, and other fruits halted operations, petitioner leased all of its facilities, continuing only tomato paste processing. Applying the successorship doctrine, the National Labor Relations Board found that petitioner committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain with the union recognized by the predecessor. Agreeing with the Board that direct purchase of the predecessor’s assets is not a prerequisite for successor status and finding that the Board’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Capital Cleaning Contractors, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  2. Perdue Farms, Inc., Cookin' Good Division, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  3. Holland, Michael v. Williams Mtn Coal CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  4. Traction Wholesale Center Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  5. Robert Penrod,petitioners v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 166,intervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API