Legal Opinion
Barbachano v. Allen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1951No. 12759PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
In 1941, the appellants recovered a judgment in the court below against Willis Allen and others. In 1950, the judgment remained unsatisfied. Appellants then moved the court for an order directing that writs of execution issue notwithstanding the lapse of more than five years since the entry of judgment. 1 The trial court found plaintiffs-appellants not guilty of laches; held that the judgment might be enforced or carried into execution irrespective of the lapse of more than five years, but ordered that the writ of execution should not be enforced against the defendant,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Greenfield v. TuccilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Greene v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Mark Riso Shelly Riso, Debtors. Gary L. Snoke v. Mark Riso Shelly RisoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Spinoso v. Heilman (In Re Heilman)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Morris Coen and Helen Coen, Bankrupts-Appellees v. William Zick, Creditor-Appellant. Morris Coen and Helen Coen, Cross-Appellants v. William ZickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Norton v. Dean (In Re Dean)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1987
- Bryan v. Manley (In Re Manley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.