Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Petrilli
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 28, 1994No. 12719PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHe Iman, J.
The plaintiffs1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after the court directed a verdict against them. The plaintiffs assert that the trial court improperly denied their motion to set aside the verdict, which they based on a claim that the court had abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of the plaintiffs’ sole expert witness on the issue of the standard of care. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary to our resolution of this appeal. Sheila Rodriguez and her husband, Ronald Rodriguez, commenced this action seeking damages from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Going v. PaganiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- DiBella v. WidlitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Weinstein v. WeinsteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grondin v. CuriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Carusillo v. Associated Women's Health Specialists, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Ruff v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Mitchell v. New Milford Hospital, No. Cv 92 0060555 (Oct. 19, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995