Legal Opinion

Going v. Pagani

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 30, 1976PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from the judgment rendered following a jury verdict for the defendants and from the court’s denial of the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict.

On November 12, 1971, Wayne A. Going, then sixteen years of age, was operating an automobile owned by his father, Merrill L. Going, on route 31 in Coventry. A collision occurred between that vehicle and one owned by Francis Cammisa and operated by Herbert I. Pagani. Through his father, Wayne brought suit against Pagani and Cammisa for personal injuries ‘and other damages and, in his individual capacity,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  2. Taylor v. Town of MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  3. Sears v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  4. Siladi v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Waldron v. RaccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. State v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API