Legal Opinion

Three in One Oil Co. v. St. Louis Rubber Cement Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 25, 1937No. 3672PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The St. Louis Rubber Cement Co., Inc., appellee, filed an application in tlie United States Patent Office for the registration of the trade-mark “3 In 1”, ■ which- it alleged it had continuously used in its business since 1901, upon a combination adhesive cement.

The Three In One Oil Company, appellant, filed an opposition to the registration of said mark, alleging the use of the same mark since 1894 on oil used in and about homes, offices, factories, garages, and elsewhere, “as a lubricator, preserver, polisher, or cleaner for metal, wood, and/or leather.” It also alleged the use and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. California Packing Corp. v. Price-Booker Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Skol Co. v. OlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  2. Time, Inc. v. Ultem Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Standard Oil Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. G. H. Packwood Mfg. Co. v. Cofax Corporation (Three Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Meredith Pub. Co. v. O. M. Scott & Sons Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API