BP Amoco Chemical Co. v. Flint Hills Resources, LLC
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintifi/eounter-defendant BP Amoco Chemical Company (“BP Amoco”) brings this motion to compel regarding plant inspection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a) against defendant/counter-plaintiff Flint Hills Resources, LLC (“Flint Hills”). For the following reasons, we grant BP Amoco’s motion.
This case arises from the sale of a refinery plant from BP Amoco to Flint Hills. 1 BP Amoco filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that it had not breached the sales contract with Flint Hills. Flint Hills subsequently filed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Norton Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Conforti & Eisele, Inc. v. DIV. BLDG. & CONSTR.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Harnischfeger Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Dyson, Inc. v. Bissell Homecare, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- James Pennington, Jr. v. Flora Community Unit School District No 35District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023