Legal Opinion

Progressive Irrigation District v. Anderson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, for Bingham County. Hon. James M. Stevens, Judge. Action to confirm the organization and the issuance of bonds by the Progressive Irrigation District. Judgment of confirmation entered by the trial court.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, for Bingham County. Hon. James M. Stevens, Judge. Action to confirm the organization and the issuance of bonds by the Progressive Irrigation District. Judgment of confirmation entered by the trial court. When the commissioners complete their proceedings and the district is organized, its existence and boundaries are notice “to all inhabitants of the district and the world.” {Fogg v. Perris Dist., 154 Cal. 209, 97 Pac. 316, at 319.) It is a question not settled in this state whether, after one confirmation proceeding as in this…

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This proceeding was begun by the board of directors of the Progressive Irrigation District, located in Bingham and Fremont counties, for the approval and confirmation of all the proceedings for the organization of said district, the issuance of $350,000 worth of bonds of the said district, an apportionment and distribution of the benefits of the land in said district, and the distribution of all costs in said matter.

It appears that the district court of Bingham county had confirmed the proceedings for the organization of said district on November 17, 1909, in which decree the court found that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Crall v. Board of Directors of Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Fogg v. Perris Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. BroseIdaho Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nebraska Mid-State Reclamation District v. Hall CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Smith v. Progressive Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Parkison v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Stevens v. LaffertyArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Crane Creek Reservoir Administration Board v. Washington County Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API