Stevens v. Lafferty
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of tlie Superior Court of tlie County of Maricopa. B. C. Stanford, Judge. ON REHEARING.
1Opinion of the CourtBoss, C. J.
The opinion of the court, which is brought into review upon this rehearing, is found supra, page 31, 193 Pac. 833. Upon a consideration of the motion for rehearing the court, being in doubt *50as to the correctness of its decision, requested counsel for appellants and appellees to “present additional argument and authorities upon the right of appellants to show in a proceeding for confirmation of bonds that their lands would receive no benefit from the organization of the drainage district, they and their predecessors in interest not having appeared before the board of supervisors upon the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Crall v. Board of Directors of Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Seidlitz v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Donovan v. OwenWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- Drake v. SchoreggeMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Tomich v. Union Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Graham County Thatcher Drainage District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1927