Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Cohn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1944No. Appeal, 51PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Hughes,

The Chancellor found the following material facts: Dwight Hartman for twenty-six years conducted a gentlemen’s tailoring shop in Beading, Berks County, making men’s clothing upon the order and to the measure of his customers. During that entire period he traded under the name of “Dundee Woolen Mills, Custom Tailors.” No competitor used a similar name in that locality. For many years the defendants and their predecessors conducted a business, which they termed nationwide, through stores throughout the United States, and have continuously used the names “Dundee”,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. American Clay Manufacturing Co. v. American Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Quaker State Oil Refining Co. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Comstock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Barnes v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Stauffer v. StaufferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Universal Builders, Inc. v. Moon Motor Lodge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Du Bois Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  5. John Wright, Inc. v. Casper Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API