Legal Opinion

Laird v. Department of Public Welfare

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

In this appeal by allowance, we are called to decide whether adopted children, whose adoptions were procured through a Pennsylvania-licensed, private adoption agency in the 1990s, are eligible to receive adoption assistance subsidies retroactive to the dates of the children’s adoptions and prospectively through their eighteenth birthdays, despite not applying for those subsidies until 2007. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the children are not eligible for any adoption subsidies, either retroactively or prospectively, and thus reverse the Commonwealth Court.

I.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. C.B. ex rel. R.R.M. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. St. Elizabeth's Child Care Center v. Deparment of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Riddle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. In re D.L.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hearst Television, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Blair County CYF v. DHSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Martin, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API