Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 5, 1990No. 71027PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ADAMS, Judge:

Appellants Tom and Marie Marshall appeal from an order of the trial court denying their Application for Leave to Amend Petition and granting Allstate’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

Allstate issued policy number 0-10-805485-08-11 149664373 (the policy) to Thomas J. Marshall on August 10, 1983 covering three vehicles. On that same day, Marshall, in writing, waived coverage for uninsured motorist pursuant to 36 O.S. § 3636(F). On March 5, 1985, a fourth vehicle was added to the policy, a 1973 Ford pickup apparently owned or used primarily by Marshall’s adult…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Shores v. First City Bank Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Beauchamp Ex Rel. Beauchamp v. Southwestern National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Hicks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. May v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Prough v. Edinger, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Roth v. Mercy Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. May v. NAT. UNION FIRE INS. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Bray v. Thomas Energy Systems, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API