Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 26, 1977No. 49713PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Justice:

This case involves an appeal by Appellants from the Trial Court’s sustention of Appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties agree as to the essential facts.

Prior to November, 1968, Appellant, George D. Hicks, carried automobile liability insurance with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, hereinafter called “Appellee”, under Policy No. 716— 059-36C, on a 1965 Ford. In November, 1968, Appellant Hicks received in the mail from Appellee, along with his automobile insurance premium notice, a form entitled “ENDORSEMENT — UNINSURED MOTORIST AUTOMOBILE COVERAGE”,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Burch v. WargoMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Russell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Brady v. Universal Underwriters Ins. GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. All American Bus Lines, Inc. v. SchusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Jimmie Elsken, Administrator of the Estate of Patricia Ann Elsken v. Network Multi-Family Security Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Makela v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Johnson v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Beauchamp Ex Rel. Beauchamp v. Southwestern National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API