Bray v. Thomas Energy Systems, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSEN, Judge:
Appellant, Gary Bray, seeks review, through the accelerated procedure provided for in Rule 1.203 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, 12 O.S., Ch. 15, App. 2, of the trial court’s order which granted the motions to dismiss of Appellees Vincent Thomas and Doyle Hinds. 1 Both Appellees moved to dis miss Appellant’s First Amended Petition on the basis it failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 12 O.S.1991, § 2012(B)(6) and because his claims are barred by the statute of limitations. In response to the motions, Appellant asserted his First Amended…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- MBA Commercial Construction, Inc. v. Roy J. Hannaford Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- In Re Syntex Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pan v. BaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Plummer v. Farmers Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2005
- Tisdale v. ITW Ramset/Red HeadCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Adams v. MoriartyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Christian v. First Capital BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006