Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Confidential Services Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 31, 2002No. 2862Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUIÑONES ALEJANDRO, J,

INTRODUCTION

Andrew Morgan, plaintiff, argues on appeal that this motion judge erred in sustaining the preliminary objections filed by defendant Delaware State University which challenged venue and this court’s personal jurisdiction over said defendant. This motion judge disagrees, in part.

RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Briefly, the relevant facts of this case, as defined by the pleadings, exhibits, and memoranda submitted in support of the parties’ respective pleadings, are as follows:

Plaintiff is an adult individual and a citizen of the State of Delaware,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kubik v. LetteriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Masel v. GlassmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Shears v. RigleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Mathues v. Tim-Bar Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API