Legal Opinion

Kubik v. Letteri

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1992No. 83 Western District Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

The question presented is one of first impression: whether Section 5322(a)(3) of the Pennsylvania long-arm statute, 42 Pa.C.S. § 5322, confers personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant in a dispute arising out of an isolated sale of a private residence, and if so, whether the exercise of such in personam jurisdiction is consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. For the reasons that follow, we find that Section 5322(a)(3) does confer personal jurisdiction in the instant case, and that such…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Etoll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Danziger & De Llano LLP v. Morgan Verkamp LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. Pennzoil Products Company v. Colelli & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Grand Entertainment Group, Ltd. v. Star Media Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API