Legal Opinion

Durant v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1988No. 547-86CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

This contract action against the United States Agriculture Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS) is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross motion. Plaintiffs, the DuRant brothers, allege that the ASCS failed to make payments to them as required under a Feed Grain Program Contract. After a careful review of the record and after hearing oral argument, the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment is granted, and the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is denied.

FACTS

Plaintiffs N.L. DuRant, Jr. and J.R. Du-Rant are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Lazy Fc RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Conner Brothers Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Son Broadcasting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  3. American Maritime Transport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Knaub v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Gregory v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API