Legal Opinion
Pep Boys v. Aranosian
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 26, 1996No. CV-94-354-MPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Pep Boys v . Aranosian CV-94-354-M 03/26/96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE The Pep Boys, Manny, Moe & Jack, Plaintiff, v. Civil N o . 94-354-M Robert Aranosian, Lynda Aranosian, and Capital City Motors, Inc., Defendants. O R D E R After a trial on the merits, the court determined that defendants violated the New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act ("Act"), N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. ("RSA") § 358-A:2. Because plaintiff was the "prevailing party" under the Act, the court ordered defendants to reimburse plaintiff for reasonable attorneys' fees and costs as required by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. KellstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Mathis v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Northern Heel Corp. v. Compo Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- State v. BenoitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- United States v. Karen DiiorioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.