Budahl v. Gordon and David Associates
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.
Appellant Deanna Budahl commenced an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered after falling on ice on the sidewalk in front of a place of business owned by appellee in the city of Brook-*854ings.1 Appellant Loren Budahl, Deanna’s husband, brought an action for loss of consortium in connection with his wife’s personal injury action. Appellants appeal from the judgment dismissing the action on appellee’s motion for a directed verdict. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
The first issue is whether the local ordinance that imposes a duty on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stenholtz v. ModicaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Budahl v. Gordon & David AssociatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Myers v. QuenzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Strandness v. Montgomery WardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Rapid City v. First National Bank of the Black HillsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Baldwin v. First National Bank of the Black HillsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Weber v. BernardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Carroll v. JobeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Herren v. GantvoortSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- First Bank of South Dakota (National Ass'n) v. VonEyeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.