Legal Opinion

First Bank of South Dakota (National Ass'n) v. VonEye

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1988No. 15636PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

First Bank of South Dakota N.A., Miller Branch (Bank), sued Barney VonEye and Evelyn May VonEye (VonEyes) on a promissory note, secured by a security agreement, and filed an ancillary action for claim and delivery to seize farm collateral subject to the security agreement. VonEyes appeal from the final judgment in favor of Bank. We affirm in part, reverse and remand in part.

VonEyes are farmer/ranchers who had transacted business with Bank for twenty-five years, through the spring of 1985. *632VonEyes had a secured real estate loan with Bank and Bank provided an operating line of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Zsa Zsa LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  4. United States v. Conrad Publishing Company, a Corporation, the Estate of Currie Conrad, John G. Conrad and Charles Conrad, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  5. Haggar v. OlfertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. RhinesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gaynor v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Farm Credit Services of America v. DouganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp. v. ParsonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API