Legal Opinion
OCI Mortgage Corp. v. Marchese
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 26, 1998No. AC 18111PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The defendant property owners in this foreclosure action appeal from the trial court’s order sustaining the plaintiffs objection to the acceptance of the attorney trial referee’s report. The plaintiff has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the *751trial court’s order is not a final judgment. We agree and grant the motion.
The defendants Carole N. Márchese and Anthony Márchese (defendants) executed a promissory note in the amount of $220,000, payable to Community Federal Savings and Loan Association (CFSLA), and secured by a mortgage on property that the defendants owned…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Kolenberg v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Essex Savings Bank v. FrimbergerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- OCI Mortgage Corp. v. MarcheseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- OCI Mortgage Corp. v. MarcheseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Douglas-Mellers v. Windsor InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002