Legal Opinion
OCI Mortgage Corp. v. Marchese
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 20, 2001No. SC 16300PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The issue presented in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that 12 U.S.C. § 1823 (e),1 codifying the doctrine established in D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 315 U.S. 447, 62 S. Ct. 676, 86 L. Ed. 956 (1942) (D’Oench, Duhme doctrine), did not apply to the defendants Carole N. Márchese and Anthony J. Márchese2 to bar their defenses of setoff and payment of a mortgage note *451issued by them to a savings and loan association that later had been declared insolvent. The plaintiff, OCI Mortgage Corporation (OCI), had acquired the…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. LatourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Caires v. JP Morgan Chase BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Shapero v. MercedeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Croall v. KohlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.