Douglas-Mellers v. Windsor Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s order sustaining the defendant’s objection to the acceptance of the attorney trial referee’s report and revoking the reference to the referee. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not an appealable final judgment. We agree that the appeal is premature and grant the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
On April 6,1998, the plaintiffs, Enia Douglas-Mellers, Cynthia Reynolds and Sasha Hart, were involved in an *709automobile accident while driving in a vehicle insured by the defendant, Windsor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rocque v. Sound Manufacturing, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Collard & Roe, P.C. v. KleinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002