Rose v. Mesmer
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION" of appellants for a restraining order pending an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. M. T. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Application for a restraining order.
The superior court rendered its judgment in this action August 1, 1900, and it was entered of record August 6th. By the judgment the rights of the several parties to the action in certain lands described therein, and in certain waters held to be appurtenant to said lands, were defined and determined. It was also adjudged that no party to the action has any right to maintain a certain dam then existing, or any dam or other obstruction in the channel of La Ballona creek, upon parcel No. 55 of the lands described in the decree, or to divert any water by means…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Imperial Water Co. No. 3 v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- City of South Gate v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Lovelock Mercantile Co. v. Lovelock Irrigation DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1928
- Martin v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.