Legal Opinion
Lapinski v. Copacino
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 21, 1944PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff, a tenant in a building of the defendant, his landlord, located in Torrington, in the Waterbury defense area, brought this action to the Court of Common Pleas, seeking to recover damages on the ground that the defendant had demanded and received rent from him for several months in an amount in excess of the maximum fixed by the regulations of the federal Office of Price Administration under the provisions of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942. 56 Stat. at Large, Chap. 26, p. 23; 50 U. S. C. App. § 901 et seq. (Sup. 1941-1943). It is not questioned that the premises were…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Welch v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Lambur v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Long v. Zoning Commission of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Gilbert v. ThierryDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1945
- Schaffer v. LeimbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.