Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Southern Ute Tribe

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1957No. 5650PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

249 F.2d 915

Mary MARTINEZ, Appellant,

v.

The SOUTHERN UTE TRIBE OF the SOUTHERN UTE RESERVATION, a corporation; and Samuel Burch, Julius Cloud, Virgil Red, Bonny Kent, John Baker and Sunshine C. Smith, as the Members of the Council of the Southern Ute Tribe of the Southern Ute Reservation, Appellees.

No. 5650.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

November 15, 1957.

Rehearing Denied December 17, 1957.

Bentley M. McMullin, Denver, Colo. (Lewis M. Perkins and Howell W. Cobb, Durango, Colo., were with him on the brief), for appellant.

LaVerne H. McKelvey and R. Franklin McKelvey, Durango, Colo.,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Talton v. MayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. United States v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1846

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. NakaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes v. NamenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. State Securities, Inc. v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Ordinance 59 Ass'n v. United States Department of the Interior SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Solomon v. LaRoseDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API