Legal Opinion

Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes v. Namen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1982No. Nos. 80-3189, 80-3190, 80-3196, 80-3216 and 80-3274PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals stem from attempts by the Confederated Salish & Koo-tenai Tribes of Flathead Reservation [hereinafter “the Tribes”] to regulate the manner in which non-Indians who own land bordering a navigable lake on the reservation exercise their riparian rights. The Tribes seek to enforce an ordinance they enacted in 1977 to regulate both existing and future structures on the bed and banks of the south half of Flathead Lake, to which the Tribes claim beneficial title. The Namens, who are non-Indian riparian landowners, the-State of Montana, and the City…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Babbitt Ford, Inc. v. Navajo Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. MilnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Greely v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationMontana Supreme Court · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API