Legal Opinion

Doneyho v. Scottdale Connecting Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1938No. Appeal, 37PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

Plaintiff was employed by the McKinney Steel Company as the operator of a locomotive crane. The steel company and defendant, Scottdale Connecting Railroad Company, used a railroad siding in common. Plaintiff was directed by Ms employer to load sand on the siding and the crane was put in position by a locomotive belonging to the steel company. When plaintiff had completed loading the sand, the crane could not at once be moved from the siding owing to the presence of cars thereon. Plaintiff, upon learning this, decided to do some work on the brake under the flat…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ralston v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Bardis v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Vogel v. TaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Neal v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Peterson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gerfin v. Colonial Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Stafford v. Reed, Admr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Petro v. Secary EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Stafford v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Aliquippa National Bank v. HarveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API