Neal v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Walling,
The track of the defendant railway company, extending through the Borough of Indiana in a northerly and southerly direction, is crossed near the passenger station by Philadelphia Street and further north by Water Street. A spur track, or siding, leaving the main line on the east side and north of the last named street, extends southerly in a widening curve ending near Philadelphia Street. In the spring of 1924 this siding was used by the Columbus Asphalt Company, which located a plant on defendant’s property, where it received and prepared road material. On May…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Grimes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Zandt v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Bardis v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Wolf v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Neal to Use v. B.R. P. Rwy. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Doneyho v. Scottdale Connecting RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Davenport v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Brown v. Krakowski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1949
- Commonwealth v. Boarts, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clarion County1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.