Legal Opinion

Neal v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1927No. Appeal, 28PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

The track of the defendant railway company, extending through the Borough of Indiana in a northerly and southerly direction, is crossed near the passenger station by Philadelphia Street and further north by Water Street. A spur track, or siding, leaving the main line on the east side and north of the last named street, extends southerly in a widening curve ending near Philadelphia Street. In the spring of 1924 this siding was used by the Columbus Asphalt Company, which located a plant on defendant’s property, where it received and prepared road material. On May…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Grimes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Zandt v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Bardis v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Wolf v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Neal to Use v. B.R. P. Rwy. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Doneyho v. Scottdale Connecting RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Davenport v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Brown v. Krakowski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1949
  5. Commonwealth v. Boarts, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clarion County1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API