Legal Opinion

Haney v. Hatfield

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1913No. Appeal, No. 189PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal, No. 189, Jan. T., 1912, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1910, No. 4349, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Cornelius Haney v. Henry Reed Hatfield. Assumpsit to recover damages for breach of a contract for the sale of land. Before Bregy, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $40,000, and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 189, Jan. T., 1912, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1910, No. 4349, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Cornelius Haney v. Henry Reed Hatfield. Assumpsit to recover damages for breach of a contract for the sale of land. Before Bregy, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $40,000, and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were various rulings of the trial judge, and various instructions to the jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stewart,

We have here forty-three assignments of error, while the propositions advanced in support of appellant’s contention are but two. We shall confine our attention to these latter.

The first is that error was committed in discharging the rule for judgment non obstante; in other words, that the case called for binding instructions for the defendant. The action was for the recovery of damages for alleged breach of contract for the sale and conveyance of land by a vendor. Hatfield, here the appellant, by his duly appointed attorney in fact, entered into a written…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Tiernan v. Roland & BlackstoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
  3. Dumars v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Markoff v. KreinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. Seidlek v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Warner Co. v. MacMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Read v. Gibson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Popper v. RosenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API