Legal Opinion

Popper v. Rosen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1928No. Appeal, 107PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

On October 7, 1926, the defendant, Frank Rosen, of Philadelphia, gave Leo Popper & Son, of New York, a written order for 100 cases 45 Cathedral glass, of which ten cases were to be shipped at once and the balance, a carload, after January 1st. The ten cases were received and paid for but on January 12, 1927, defendant wrote plaintiffs asking for modification of the contract, including a special privilege of examination of the carload on arrival, for an extended credit as to payment, etc. Plaintiffs at once replied declining to grant any change in the contract…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Western & A. Pipe Lines v. Home Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1891
  3. New York & Pennsylvania Co. v. Cunard Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Haney v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Pittsburgh Provision & Packing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Germantown T. Co. v. Emhardt (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Rozmus v. THOMPSON'S LINCOLN-MERC. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Harvey Probber, Inc. v. KauffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Fiumara v. American Surety Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API