Seidlek v. Bradley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mu. Justice Kephart,.
This appeal involves the question of damages recoverable by a vendee where the vendor breaches a written contráct for the sale of real estate. The court below was asked to charge the jury that, as plaintiff sought to recover a larger measure of damages than the amount of money paid at the execution of the contract, it was necessary to show that defendant practiced fraud, artifice or collusion at the inception of the original contract, and, as there was no such evidence of fraud connected with the original contract, the only damages recoverable is the hand money…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hertzog v. Hertzog's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Rineer v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Bitner v. BroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Stephens v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Fannin v. CrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Haskell v. HeathcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Empire Properties, Inc. v. Equireal, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Baldassari v. BaldassariSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.