Legal Opinion

Markoff v. Kreiner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 4, 1941No. [No. 33, April Term, 1941.]PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.

A suit for damages for breach of contract for the sale of real estate was instituted by Mary E. Kreiner, purchaser, against David J. Markoff, seller, and Mollie Herman, real estate agent, alleging (1) that the defendants made alterations in the contract without her authorization, and (2) that they refused to provide a mortgage loan for the balance of the purchase price as they had promised.

The plaintiff alleged in her amended declaration that on January 15, 1940, she agreed to purchase an apartment house on North Charles Street in Baltimore, subject to ground rent, for the sum of $5,200; that…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Richardson v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Thomas Roberts & Co. v. BonaparteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  5. Cohn v. DunnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Ray v. EuriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  4. McKeever v. Washington Heights Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Evergreen Amusement Corp. v. MilsteadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API