Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
Decided March 7, 2006No. GDTC-T-04-116-TBWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT, PLAN “B”, MOTION TO STRIKE
WILSON, Judge.
The Plaintiffs second amended complaint sets forth four counts against three separate Defendants. The Plaintiff alleges that on November 22, 2003 he was a patron at the Mohegan Sun Casino, a gaming facility under the control of the Defendant, Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority (MTGA), an entity of the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut. He alleges that on that date he was descending an escalator located in the casino when he was caused to fall off the escalator. The Plaintiff sustained grievous personal injuries.
In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Nolan v. MorelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Drysdale ex rel. Drysdale v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murphy v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2007
- Murphy v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006