Murphy v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT, PLAN “IF’, MOTION TO STRIKE
WILSON, Judge.
I
This is the second Motion to Strike filed by the Defendant Plan “B” in this case. The first such motion was directed to the Plaintiffs second amended complaint which set forth two causes of action against Plan “B”: Count Three alleged a claim of recklessness; and Count Four a claim of negligence, in the serving of alcohol to the Plaintiff. The court granted the motion as to Count Four and denied it as to Count Three. Murphy v. MTGA, 3 G.D.R. 11, 6 Am. Tribal Law 580, 2006 WL 6181099 (2006). The facts, procedural…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Kostiuk v. QueallySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Drysdale ex rel. Drysdale v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murphy v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006