Legal Opinion

State v. Moline

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 12, 1992No. 91-2622PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In this case involving a refusal to submit to an implied consent blood alcohol test, the officer did not immediately prepare and serve a Notice of Intent to Revoke form following refusal. There are two issues: Does the statute so mandate? If so, does eventual service provide sufficient notice to satisfy due process and give the court personal jurisdiction? We hold that, although the statute contemplates immediate preparation and service following refusal, it is directory, not mandatory. So long as a defendant has received notice and a chance to be heard, due process is not offended and,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. NordnessWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. GouldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. Danielson v. Brody Seating Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Elm Park Iowa, Inc. v. DennistonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. State v. GautschiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. State v. VillamilCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
  5. State v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API