State v. Gautschi
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DEININGER, J.
¶ 1. Stephen Gautschi appeals an order revoking his motor vehicle operating privilege based on his refusal to submit to an implied consent blood alcohol test. He argues that the notice of intent to revoke his operating privilege failed to provide the information required by WlS. STAT. § 343.305(9)(a)5, thereby depriving the trial court of personal jurisdiction to revoke his operating privilege. We conclude that although the notice contained a technical error, it did not prejudice Gautschi. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. Gautschi was arrested for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Jadair Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Gaddis v. LaCrosse Products, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Omark-Prentice Hydraulics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Burnett v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- State v. AnagnosWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- City of Crandon v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019