Legal Opinion
In Re Romansky
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 20, 2007No. 05-BG-658PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
This case returns to the Court of Appeals from the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) after a remand in In re Romansky, 825 A.2d 311 (D.C.2003) (“Romansky I”). In its first Report and Recommendation, the Board found that the respondent had committed three distinct violations of District of Columbia Rules of PROf’l Conduct R. 8.4(c), which provides, “It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to ... [e]ngage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation. ...” In Romansky I, we affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re Harry TunDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- In re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Sandy v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Tarpeh v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.