Legal Opinion

In re Sandy v. Lee

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 2014No. 12-BG-630PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before us upon the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”). The Board found that respondent Sandy V. Lee committed intentional misappropriation by negotiating a check without the authorization or endorsement of one of the named payees and taking his fee from the proceeds. The Board has unanimously recommended to this court that respondent be disbarred based upon this intentional misappropriation as well as other misconduct, particularly respondent’s flagrant dishonesty and false testimony before the Hearing Committee. Respondent takes…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Wendell RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. In re Wendell RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API