Legal Opinion

Liptak v. Diane Apartments, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1980No. Civ. 57654PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GALE, J. *

The home of appellants George P. Liptak and Virginia M. Liptak was damaged by earth movements. Appellants brought suit to recover for such damages and among the defendants sued appellants named P. R. C. Toups Engineering, Inc. (Toups) and Donald R. Warren Company (Warren), each of whom were involved in the grading and filling of the slope that moved and caused the damage. Toups and Warren demurred to the complaint on the ground that it was barred on its face by the statute of limitations, Code of Civil Procedure, section 337.15. The demurrers were sustained and judgments of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. North Coast Business Park v. Nielsen Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Mills v. Forestex Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Lockley v. Law Office of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Pulver v. Avco Financial ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API