Farthing v. Farthing
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.
The court below was without original jurisdiction to entertain this action to nullify any part of the duly probated will which is the subject matter of this action. Hence the judgment entered must be vacated on authority of In re Will of Puett, 229 N.C. 8, 47 S.E. 2d 488; Brissie v. Craig, 232 N.C. 701, 62 S.E. 2d 330; Anderson v. Atkinson, 234 N.C. 271; Anderson v. Atkinson, ante, 300.
The Declaratory Judgment Act, G.S. Ch. 1, Art. 26, is designed to provide an expeditious method of procuring a judicial decree construing wills, contracts, and other written instruments and declaring the rights…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brissie v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- In Re Will of PuettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Anderson v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bueltel v. Lumber Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Terrell v. Lawyers Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Yount v. YountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Bennett v. Attorney General of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- A. Perin Development Co. v. Ty-Par Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.